Ticks have an important impact on the production of cattle because apart from the damage to hides and skins, they can damage organs such as the udder, scrotum, and the ears of cattle.
Less well known is the effect known as “tick worry”. This is the suppressive effect on the appetite of the animal due to a component in the tick saliva. With heavy infestations this will
negatively effect the growthrate and production of the animals. Less meat and milk are produced as a result. Some tick species are potential transmitters of diseases such as heartwater,
redwater, anaplasmosis and tick toxicoses. These conditions will be dealt with in a separate article.
This is the frequent and continuous treatment to minimise exposure of animals to ticks
(weekly in summer and every 2 weeks in winter). The animals are therefore not exposed to the tick borne diseases
and vaccination is unnecessary. Intensive control is used in dairies since ticks cause serious damage to udders
and tick-transmitted diseases are unacceptable, because of their effect on production. Other advantages are the
elimination of tick worry and its negative effect on growth and production, no tick damage and a reduction of
tick numbers. Good supervision and management is required for intensive tick control.
The disadvantages are that cattle are totally susceptible to tick borne diseases and if a problem arises with
dipping (technique or resistance) large numbers of animals may develop tick-borne disease. Intensive control
is not recommended for those cattle breeds which are “tick tolerant ” because their resistance is acquired on
exposure to ticks and will be lost under intensive control. Examples of tick tolerant animals are Ngunis,
Bonsmaras and Afrikanders. Intensive treatment requires capital investment for dipping apparatus, and dips.
What kind of tick control?
The type of farming (dairy/extensive/feedlot).
The species of ticks which occur on the farm.
The tick borne diseases in the area.
The breed of animal.
Photo 1. The engorged female ticks of different species are difficult for the layman to distinguish (Schering Plough Animal Health)
Photo 2. A heavy infestation of blue ticks (Dr Robin Taylor)
Strategic control and stable disease situation br>
Strategic control needs less frequent dipping than intensive control. The aim is to reduce the number of ticks
but to maintain sufficient numbers to allow the exposure of animals to infected ticks which will “immunise”
animals against the prevailing tick borne diseases. The advantages are less expenditure on dips and dipping
equipment. The disadvantages are that either there are still ticks around to cause damage and tick worry which
can severely affect production.
Sporadic deaths due to tickborne disease can still occur and vaccination should be practiced. Although
strategic control often seems the most attractive option to farmers it is difficult to achieve in practice
because it is hard to establish the correct dipping intervals i.e. to know how many ticks are required for
sufficient immunisation. This is especially so if all three tick-borne diseases are present because they are
transmitted by different species of ticks, each of which require different dipping intervals. For example dipping
to achieve a stable situation for heartwater and to reduce damage by three-host ticks, may result in the intensive control
of blue ticks and cause insufficient natural immunisation against redwater. To further complicate the issue, droughts
may reduce the numbers of ticks below the level required for immunisation. Vaccination of adults animals may be required
to re-establish immunity. Stable situations are easier to achieve in areas where ticks are numerous and the
farmer is prepared to accept some losses of production.
Methods of tick control
Plunge dip: if a plunge dip is well designed it is the most effective method of wetting animals. In the long term plunge dipping is the most cost effective method if large numbers of animals are involved.
Spray races: well designed and managed races will achieve good wetting but spot treatment may still be needed
under tails and in ears. There must be sufficient arches and wetting nozzles to achieve good wetting. Hand or
mechanical spraying: this is the most expensive and difficult method to do successfully. The minimum volume of
application is 5 litres and it may require as much as 10 litres to get good wetting. Pour-ons: this method is
convenient but application must be precise. The remedy takes time to spread over the body. Pyrethroid pour-ons
can cause irritation and resistance can develop rapidly. Injection with macrocyclic lactones: this is a
convenient method of control but only effective against blue ticks.
Management of pastures can help to reduce the number of ticks on cattle. The resting of camps if done for
sufficiently long intervals; if the grass can be burnt this will help reduce tick numbers.Planted pastures are
much less attractive to ticks than natural pasture, but even under zerograzing conditions, the use of hay can
cause the introduction of sufficient ticks to cause disease.
Photo 3. Select the correct dipping method for your management situation (Schering Plough Animal Health)
Dips for cattle
There are currently 5 main groups of remedies registered for the control of ticks in SA. Pyrethroids:
examples are deltamethrin, flumethrin, and cyhalothrin. They are effective against ticks and flies which is
useful in dairies where fly borne disease such as three-day stiffsickness need to be controlled. The
disadvantages are irritation of pyrethroid pour-ons at certain times of the year. Pyrethroids are
oxpecker-friendly unless they are in combination with organophosphates.
Amitraz: is very effective against all tick species and mites. The dip causes the ticks to detach almost
immediately and “hotfoot” aimlessly around on the animals. These ticks then die sometime later. Amitraz is
very safe for mammals including humans and oxpeckers. It is suitable for dairy animals but doesn’t control
flies. Organophosphates: chlorphenfinvos is the commonly used organophosphate on cattle. It is effective
against all species of ticks as well as lice. It has become effective again following a long period of disuse
due to the development of resistance. The organophosphates are the most toxic of the dips and must be diluted,
used and disposed of with extreme care. Don’t use in areas where oxpeckers occur.
Macrocyclic lactones (MLs): this group contains the remedies ivermectin, moxidectin, doramectin, etc. They
only work against blue ticks and because the remedy is injected into the animal, the tick must first feed
before the remedy takes effect, so there is still the possibility of disease transmission. The MLs are
especially useful in areas where only blue ticks are a problem or where they are resistant to other dips.
They are also effective against roundworms and mites. Some MLs may have a negative impact on the biology of
Insect Growth Regulators (IGRs): an example of this group is fluazuron which is available as a pour-on. It is
important to understand that IGRs do not affect adult ticks but inhibit the immature stages, resulting in a
gradual reduction of tick numbers and the prevention of eggs being laid. The IGRs control blue ticks and as
with MLs there is an initial delay in the effect of the remedy. IGRs are not registered for use in dairy cattle.
Why dips sometimes appear not to work
Farmers become annoyed when there are still ticks present after dipping or ticks reappear rapidly on their
cattle after dipping. It is important to understand the many factors that can play a role in the efficacy of
dips. Here is a list of some of these:
The dip may be too weak due to over dilution or under replenishment. This often occurs due to the
capacity of the dip tank being underestimated. Testing of the dip wash will establish if the
concentration is sufficient.
The dip tank may be too shallow and doesn’t wet the heads of the animals.
Wetting in a spray race may be poor due to structural and functional defects.
With hand or mechanical spraying, problems are almost always due to insufficient dip being used to wet the animals.
MLs take time to act because the ticks have to feed before there are any effects.
Pyrethroids can take up to 2 days to kill ticks and some stay attached despite being dead, especially
Pour-ons may take 2-3 days to spread over the animal and their effect on the lower body areas (belly and
legs) will be slower than on the head and neck.
Ticks may climb on animals after the residual effect is past (after 3 days). TThis occurs especially
when farmers put animals in new camps which are alive with thousands of hungry ticks.
Rain and wet grass washes off dip.
The animals used for stirring the dip are not returned to the dip when it is at the proper concentration.
IGRs will not kill adult ticks.
When there is a massive population of ticks due to warm wet conditions, frequent dipping is required to reduce the numbers.
Resistance can be suspected when a dip group has been used for long periods of time. Ticks can be collected and tested for resistance.
Product is damaged, under standard or expired.
Photo 4. Some dips can be lethal to oxpeckers (Endangered Wildlife Trust)